Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Emily Van Driessen's avatar

Hahaha Tracey Emin always knows best!

Expand full comment
Bill Reynolds's avatar

OK, Tatum, let me list the content that I found offensive, point by point.

1) Your headline indicates that the post is about "shopping." OK, not something that interest me, but it was at an artfair.

2) "And sex toys at the Louvre (yes, really)" Granted I should have stopped right there, but I was hopeful.

3) Then there is a series of paintings by women. Some of this work looks a little too familiar, but so what. Then there is the Polish(?) artist rendition of a woman in a bathroom with what appears to be an inflatable man.

4/ Then there is the vulgar quote from Tracy Emin. Followed by sex toys at the Louvre.

Admittedly, I am impatient with the lionization of Kamala Harris, and women in general, for the sake of defeating Trump. It may be necessary, but what appears to me as abuse will be difficult to walk back.

I long for the days when art history, the history of ideas, of "marks" if you will, mattered; those days before market driven work. Where being unable or unwilling to draw competently, or learn, was not considered cool, but disingenuous. (There was a show of early Mondrian years ago. Mondrian was a talented, if conventional artist. The show did not explain sufficiently why he evolved into the artist we know today, or why neoplasticism matters, and I'm not sure that it does. And, of course, no one cares.) Not in our lifetime perhaps, but there will be a post-finance world, where private equity no longer rules and finances war capitalism. Where iconic paintings are not stored in vaults in Switzerland, like gold bars. There was a time when painting was a profession rather than a lifestyle, before artist were a brand. The good ol' days... but I digress and have spent way too much time composing this response.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts